Methodology
Humanities Superpowers 2.0
A public research methodology and protocol designed to preserve interpretive friction and researcher judgment.
Open public service ↗Purpose
It provides a research workflow that separates AI proposals, evidence, and researcher judgment instead of treating AI as a substitute for scholarly decision-making.
Research questions
- How should decisions to accept, revise, or reject AI proposals be recorded?
- How can interpretive friction and evidence checking be preserved in research?
Method and workflow
The public methodology and tools environment distinguish AI proposals, evidence checking, and researcher judgment. Final scholarly judgment is not delegated to generated output.
Current status
The repository confirms a methodology page and a public service link. The current detailed version and performance figures are not treated as verified here.
Verified public results
Verified public outputs in scope are the Humanities Superpowers service and its Lee Humanities methodology description. No unverified quality or cost claims are added.
Use and participation
The public page and linked service may be consulted. Account, private, or permissioned capabilities are not promised without verification.
Limits and connections
This page does not establish quantitative effectiveness. Detailed versioning and concrete application cases require source verification.